To place an obituary, please include the information from the obituary checklist below in an email to obits@pioneerpress.com. There is no option to place them through our website at this time. Feel free to contact our obituary desk at 651-228-5263 with any questions.
General Information:
Your full name,
Address (City, State, Zip Code),
Phone number,
And an alternate phone number (if any)
Obituary Specification:
Name of Deceased,
Obituary Text,
A photo in a JPEG or PDF file is preferable, TIF and other files are accepted, we will contact you if there are any issues with the photo.
Ad Run dates
There is a discount for running more than one day, but this must be scheduled on the first run date to apply.
If a photo is used, it must be used for both days for the discount to apply, contact us for more information.
Policies:
Verification of Death:
In order to publish obituaries a name and phone number of funeral home/cremation society is required. We must contact the funeral home/cremation society handling the arrangements during their business hours to verify the death. If the body of the deceased has been donated to the University of Minnesota Anatomy Bequest Program, or a similar program, their phone number is required for verification.
Please allow enough time to contact them especially during their limited weekend hours.
A death certificate is also acceptable for this purpose but only one of these two options are necessary.
Guestbook and Outside Websites:
We are not allowed to reference other media sources with a guestbook or an obituary placed elsewhere when placing an obituary in print and online. We may place a website for a funeral home or a family email for contact instead; contact us with any questions regarding this matter.
Obituary Process:
Once your submission is completed, we will fax or email a proof for review prior to publication in the newspaper. This proof includes price and days the notice is scheduled to appear.
Please review the proof carefully. We must be notified of errors or changes before the notice appears in the Pioneer Press based on each day’s deadlines.
After publication, we will not be responsible for errors that may occur after final proofing.
Online:
Changes to an online obituary can be handled through the obituary desk. Call us with further questions.
Payment Procedure:
Pre-payment is required for all obituary notices prior to publication by the deadline specified below in our deadline schedule. Please call 651-228-5263 with your payment information after you have received the proof and approved its contents.
Credit Card: Payment accepted by phone only due to PCI (Payment Card Industry) regulations
EFT: Check by phone. Please provide your routing number and account number.
Rates:
The minimum charge is $162 for the first 12 lines.
Every line after the first 12 is $12.
If the ad is under 12 lines it will be charged the minimum rate of $162.
Obituaries including more than 40 lines will receive a 7.5% discount per line.
On a second run date, receive a 20% discount off both the first and second placement.
Place three obituaries and the third placement will be free of charge.
Each photo published is $125 per day. For example: 2 photos in the paper on 2 days would be 4 photo charges at $500.
Deadlines:
Please follow deadline times to ensure your obituary is published on the day requested.
Hours
Deadline (no exceptions)
Ad
Photos
MEMORIAM (NON-OBITUARY) REQUEST
Unlike an obituary, Memoriam submissions are remembrances of a loved one who has passed. The rates for a memoriam differ from obituaries.
Please call or email us for more memoriam information
Please call 651-228-5280 for more information.
HOURS: Monday – Friday 8:00AM – 5:00PM (CLOSED WEEKENDS and HOLIDAYS)
Please submit your memoriam ad to memoriams@pioneerpress.com or call 651-228-5280.
On Sunday morning, reporters on many TV networks were poring over multiple videos of the shooting over the weekend of a protester in Minneapolis by immigration agents, trying to understand what happened from slow-mo footage and freeze-frame images.
But on Fox News, the nation’s top-rated cable news network, there was little of that kind of analysis. Instead, most of its hosts, reporters and guests appeared laser focused since the shooting late Saturday morning on supporting the Trump administration’s official narrative: that Alex Pretti, a 37-year old intensive care nurse, brought the violence upon himself.
“Only one person could have prevented this from happening and it’s Alex Pretti,” said Charlie Hurt, co-host of “Fox & Friends Weekend” on Sunday morning. “He should have not been there.”
Pretti’s killing in Minneapolis came scarcely two weeks after the fatal shooting of Renee Good by a federal agent in the city as part of an immigration enforcement action. The incidents have led to mounting outrage from members of the public and demands from public officials, including Minnesota’s Democratic governor, Tim Walz, that Border Patrol and ICE agents leave the state immediately.
Fox News’ handling of Pretti’s killing also highlighted what appears to be its willingness to play down or overlook evidence that could contradict the federal government’s version of events. The coverage made for a jarring disconnect between the narrative found on the conservative network and the one on other outlets.
“A lot of what Fox does, in general, is to make arguments that Donald Trump will make seem more reasonable,” said Anthony Nadler, a professor at Ursinus College who studies conservative media. “That means being extremely selective about what aspects of reality you’ll include in that narrative.”
In response to a request for comment, Fox noted that it had preempted regular weekend programming to expand coverage of the shooting, had multiple reporters on the ground in Minneapolis and had interviewed Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel about the episode.
Pretti’s father told The Associated Press on Saturday that his son was on the streets protesting because he was “very upset with what was happening in Minneapolis and throughout the U.S.” with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
Videos from the scene show that at the time he was confronted by Border Patrol agents, Pretti was filming with his own phone and appeared to be trying to defend a woman who had been pushed to the ground by the same officers. While he did have a gun, it was in its holster, the videos show, and local law enforcement has said that he had a legal permit to carry a firearm.
The Department of Homeland Security posted on social media that Pretti “approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun” and that they tried to disarm him. But videos analyzed by The New York Times and other news outlets appear to show that Pretti never took his pistol out of his holster, even after multiple masked agents sprayed him in the face with chemical irritants and forced him to the ground. Instead, one agent removed Pretti’s firearm and immediately after that, two other officers began shooting him in the back.
Yet on Sunday morning, that kind of analysis was nowhere to be found on Fox. Instead, Matt Finn, a reporter for Fox on the ground in Minneapolis, citing statements from the Department of Homeland Security, said that Pretti “had a 9 mm semiautomatic handgun on him and two full magazines when he approached agents,” adding that “an agent, fearing for his life, ultimately shot Pretti.”
Others on the channel supported suggestions that Pretti had brandished his weapon and had actively threatened the agents. That was how multiple federal officials described the incident, including Noem and Gregory Bovino, who heads Border Patrol operations. On Saturday, Bovino claimed in a news conference that Pretti “wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”
On Saturday night, Nicole Parker, a Fox contributor, said on air that “when you’re seeing a gun in your face and you’re in the scuffle, then you have to, again, assume that is a gun.” Early Sunday morning, Chris Clem, a retired Border Patrol agent interviewed on Fox News, called the shooting “tragic” but said that Pretti “put agents in a situation where they had to use deadly force.”
Not all voices on the network joined the narrative. On Saturday evening, Ted Williams, a former police officer and defense lawyer who is now a Fox News contributor, told Fox that he saw no evidence of Pretti drawing his weapon and called for a thorough investigation of the shooting.
And on Sunday, Maria Bartiromo, the host of “Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo” on Fox, disputed statements by Patel that Pretti had attacked the Border Patrol agents.
“But how was he threatening Border Patrol?” Bartiromo asked. “How was he using that handgun in terms of threatening Border Patrol? What was that threat? He had his camera, right, he was filming it.”
In an interview with Noem, also Sunday, Peter Doocy, the senior White House correspondent for Fox News, questioned her claim that the agents had followed protocol when confronting Pretti.
“If he was disarmed,” Doocy asked, “is it the protocol to use deadly force?”
Still, those questions were the exception on Fox as it covered the fatal shooting in politicized terms.
On Saturday, one Fox reporter described huge crowds forming on the streets despite the subzero temperatures in Minneapolis as part of “an organized movement.” It is a version of events that suggests the protests are somehow inauthentic, a claim pushed by Trump, who last week called the protesters “paid agitators and insurrectionists.”
Last week, the Department of Justice sent grand jury subpoenas to a number of Minnesota officials, including Walz and Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis, as part of an investigation into whether they obstructed the immigration sweep. In a statement, Walz called the inquiry “political theater” and a “partisan distraction.”
On Sunday, Griff Jenkins, a “Fox & Friends Weekend” host, blamed those Democratic officials for this weekend’s shooting. He said that Pretti “was urged by the mayor and the governor to go out and confront them,” adding, “Why an individual would confront federal immigration law enforcement with a handgun is beyond me.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.